Showing posts with label Penal Substitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Penal Substitution. Show all posts

Monday, January 14, 2008

A Defense of Penal Substitution


Below is a link to a lecture on Penal Substitution by Dan G. McCartney, Professor of New Testament at Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia. Anyone with a beard like that has to be right...


Link

Saturday, November 04, 2006

Theological Question For The Day

Here is a statement:

You see without the actual transmission of the Savior’s blood onto the heart of the sinner there is no remission of sin.

What do you think?

Thursday, July 13, 2006

What Kind of Judge is the Father?

My most recent issue of Modern Reformation magazine-if you do not subscribe to this thought-provoking magazine you should-had an essay written by Korey Maas (who is an assistant professor of theology and church history at Concordia University in Irvine, Calif.) that dealt with an issue that is at the forefront of a discussion going on at Classical Presbyterian’s blog-which you can access from this website-dealing with who gets to be married at a Christian Church. One side of the argument says that there must be standards and those standards should be enforced. The other challenges with the viewpoint that if we tell the sinful couple no that they will driven away from the church and that we should accept them into the church and hope that they see the error of their ways by being in the body. As is with most arguments it stems from two basic premises:

1) What is Holy Scripture and how authoritative is it?
2) What kind of judge is the Father?

The First question-I believe-can be answered by the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy and can be found here:
http://www.reformed.org/documents/icbi.html

The Second question is answered by Korey Maas and can be found here:
http://www.modernreformation.org/km06judge.htm